Side by side
A high-level summary; combining both is often the answer in larger environments.
| Criterion | Zabbix | Grafana |
|---|---|---|
| Role | Monitoring and alerting (collection and triggers) | Visualization and dashboards |
| Alerting | Native and robust | Via Grafana Alerting |
| Dashboards | Functional | Reference in visualization |
| Data sources | Its own agents and templates | 100+ sources (Prometheus, SQL, etc.) |
| Ideal use | Observability foundation | Visualization layer |
How to use
Zabbix collects metrics and fires alerts with severity and context.
Grafana builds dashboards per audience (NOC, infra, management).
Grafana reads from Zabbix and other sources; you do not have to pick one.
Less noise and the right action, with runbooks and escalation.
24x7 operations when contracted, with an explicit SLA.
Threshold, item, and dashboard reviews after changes.
How it works
Pricing varies by environment size, integrations, and coverage. The proposal details the scope.
FAQ
No. The most common setup is Zabbix for collection/alerting and Grafana for visualization.
No. Grafana visualizes; Zabbix collects and alerts natively and robustly.
Yes. Grafana covers 100+ sources, including Prometheus and databases.
When contracted, with hours and escalation defined in the proposal.
Contact or commercial WhatsApp with a view of the environment (hosts, sites, criticality).
Tell us the number of hosts/services and current tools — we reply with a proposal.
Commercial WhatsApp